While both direct and indirect confusion occur in the real world, the use of this distinction in the legal test of a likelihood of confusion is unnecessary. Further, the requirement to explain a ...
It may be punny or even funny, but a unanimous Supreme Court has decided that the “Bad Spaniels” dog-toy brand may infringe and dilute the “Jack Daniel’s” trademark.[1] Last week’s opinion puts an end ...
In a recent decision (Cofresco Frischhalterprodukte GmbH & Co KG v Controller of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks & Reynolds Metals Company (Ms Justice Finlay Geoghegan, June 14 2007), the Irish High ...
Gregory has counseled clients concerning a broad range of intellectual property issues, negotiated trademark licenses, purchases, and consent agreements, and litigated numerous trademark, copyright, ...
In Aceites del Sur-Coosur SA v Koipe Corporación SL, the ECJ has held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the figurative trademarks LA ESPAÑOLA and CARBONELL for olive oil. The case ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback