April 20, 2011 (Hamilton, Ontario) — A new study from the Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation (POISE) trial suggests that monitoring non–cardiac-surgery patients for asymptomatic myocardial infarctions ...
MUNCIE, Ind. – Nothing ruins your day faster than back pain. No matter what you do, how you sit, how you stand, how you stretch and how much heat, ice, or both, you put on it, it just won't seem to go ...
The prognosis of patients who have a myocardial infarction during or after coronary artery bypass surgery may depend on how those periprocedural events are defined, according to the results of a new ...
NuVasive, Inc. NUVA successfully continues to make way through the company’s strategy to strengthen footprint in the fast-growing spine market. Following last week’s announcement of Vertera Spine ...
Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on . We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please ...
CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Spinal Elements, a Carlsbad, CA-based medical device company focused on spine surgery procedures, today introduced its MIS Ultra™ platform of products and procedures ...
DePuy Synthes today announced the launch of CONCORDE™ Clear MIS Discectomy Device, a surgical solution designed to simplify discectomy in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery. Now available in ...
CAMP HILL, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Forma Medical Inc., a leader in orthopedic Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) solutions, today announced the limited market release of OptimalTMT, an innovative MIS ...
VANCOUVER, BC, May 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ - New global reports on the Spine and Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF), along with Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS) markets, from iData Research ...
For patients who may benefit from a major liver operation to treat cancer, an open abdominal procedure is often the only option. However, a minimally invasive approach that avoids the large open ...
Mean time of the surgery for Group B was 103.19 minutes (SD 20.94), while the mean time for Group A was 130 minutes (SD 26.94). This means applying the MIS technique required 26% more time (p < 0.001) ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results