Half of scientific peer reviewers now rely on artificial intelligence to evaluate manuscripts, yet 75% of researchers report ...

It has become harder than ever for researchers to get their work published in top-tier, peer-reviewed journals, says Alison McCook, the magazine’s news editor. As the number of rejection letters to ...

Peer reviews cost firms time and effort, and some accountants believe the process is focused on finding mistakes, but the purpose of peer reviews is to enhance engagement quality. Peer reviews can ...

The implementation of Phase IV of the peer review mandate has been postponed by one year. Firms now have time until 31 December 2026 to meet the certification ...

Under phase four, two sets of accounting companies must hold a valid Peer Review Certificate before certain audit assignments ...

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has deferred Phase IV of its Peer Review Mandate by one year, shifting the ...

As part of its overall strategy to strengthen audit quality, in 2014 the AICPA issued the discussion paper Enhancing Audit Quality: Plans and Perspectives for the U.S. CPA Profession, which provides a ...

The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, ...

The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, ...

Peer review is a learning strategy by which students assess work by their peers and provide feedback to each other on the quality of their work. WebCampus peer review tools are integrated into ...

Each journal has a somewhat unique system for reviewing papers, and each paper will have a unique journey through a journal?s reviewing machinery. But I?ve learned that even though peer review has ...

In response to the Closing Bell article in Jan. 27, 2003, 1 I often think that the peer review system being blinded only one way (i.e., against the submitter but not the reviewer) is flawed and should ...